| WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread | |
|
+25Traesive CyprusWHM WingZero Kaji Motomiya AstoXx zawarudo Pcyborg Lich_Lord_Fortissimo corundum meeb veldrien Dark5ide Kotters HugeMcLargeTall PuppyCop FBZyphere0101 Epideme smellmybox MechaCrash Klaus SoulKaiser HerO Wolfen Alice 3XXXDDD 29 posters |
|
Author | Message |
---|
veldrien
| Subject: Re: WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread 2012-10-21, 06:11 | |
| The only reason I'm even the slightest bit hostile is because of all the bs you have been spreading and apparently I'm the first ine to call you on it. | |
|
| |
Alice Admin
| Subject: Re: WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread 2012-10-21, 06:11 | |
| No, you should offer legitimate rebuttals instead of getting mad and voicing random unsubstantiated outbursts. | |
|
| |
veldrien
| Subject: Re: WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread 2012-10-21, 06:19 | |
| Eh... if I had more time / not on my phone at work I would type more, guess it can wait till tomorrow. | |
|
| |
Alice Admin
| Subject: Re: WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread 2012-10-21, 06:19 | |
| If you ever get the urge to debate me, make a new thread. If you'd rather yell at me, move to PM.
Also I extend an invitation to IRC to hash it out in real-time if you really want to. | |
|
| |
meeb
| Subject: Re: WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread 2012-10-21, 10:48 | |
| - veldrien wrote:
- Eh... if I had more time / not on my phone at work I would type more, guess it can wait till tomorrow.
So what exactly was your thought process here? "I'M SUPER MAD! I'm going to throw out a lot of rude, and challenging statements at Alice without presenting the slightest bit of evidence or even explaining my reasoning for disagreement. That'll change things!" | |
|
| |
SoulKaiser
| Subject: Re: WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread 2012-10-21, 12:13 | |
| If he's got a beef he can back up his arguments with science, not bitching. I just hope whatever he says that Alice make it publicly available. | |
|
| |
Alice Admin
| Subject: Re: WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread 2012-10-21, 12:23 | |
| Not if he tells me in confidence, I won't. | |
|
| |
3XXXDDD Admin
| Subject: Re: WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread 2012-10-21, 12:26 | |
| So Christoper Fernau (German Champion) wins Euros with lots of Garmore and little of Ezel. Second place was the Manchester Champion with the same thing I think? He started with Kryph anyway. | |
|
| |
veldrien
| Subject: Re: WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread 2012-10-21, 12:30 | |
| I did explain my reasoning somewhat, but if we are going full debate mode here I really don't feel like typing numerous paragraphs on my phone. Even that first message was from a desktop while I was on my break. | |
|
| |
3XXXDDD Admin
| Subject: Re: WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread 2012-10-21, 12:38 | |
| - veldrien wrote:
- I did explain my reasoning somewhat, but if we are going full debate mode here I really don't feel like typing numerous paragraphs on my phone. Even that first message was from a desktop while I was on my break.
If you do wish to continue this, I'd suggest to wait until you are once again on a laptop or desktop computer. In the meantime, formulate the said argument into something more clear and concise than what I just read. | |
|
| |
meeb
| Subject: Re: WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread 2012-10-21, 14:28 | |
| - veldrien wrote:
- I did explain my reasoning somewhat, but if we are going full debate mode here I really don't feel like typing numerous paragraphs on my phone. Even that first message was from a desktop while I was on my break.
No you didn't... You didn't explain your reasoning at all. You said "your assessment on several cards (SDD, and crossrides) is incorrect." You didn't give any hint as to why she would be incorrect. The only reasoning I saw was "these people topped, and you didn't!" But that would be argument from authority. If Alice's position was "Spectral Duke is bad. And if you lose it you will never top" then yeah she'd be wrong and your post would have been sufficient. Given that people have placed in tournaments using Trial Decks of all things, it is possible to win using suboptimal deck builds and card choices. | |
|
| |
3XXXDDD Admin
| Subject: Re: WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread 2012-10-23, 05:25 | |
| Manchester Qualifiers up. Note, Bushiroad only expected a third of the participants so Block A (which had the top 4 French, Top 2 German and such) had to move to Fanboy 3 until some people got eliminated. | |
|
| |
SoulKaiser
| Subject: Re: WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread 2012-10-23, 08:58 | |
| Kick Ass! At least we know the game is growing past expectations. | |
|
| |
3XXXDDD Admin
| Subject: Re: WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread 2012-10-24, 14:43 | |
| Manchester VideosA bunch of feature matches from Manchester thanks to Cardfight Central. They haven't put it up yet but they have videos of the T8 and European Championship matches. | |
|
| |
SoulKaiser
| Subject: Re: WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread 2012-10-24, 16:15 | |
| I suspected the Darren would be the better player due to his merchandise belaying his previous gaming experience. | |
|
| |
3XXXDDD Admin
| Subject: Re: WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread 2012-10-24, 18:07 | |
| - SoulKaiser wrote:
- I suspected the Darren would be the better player due to his merchandise belaying his previous gaming experience.
Being good at one game doesn't necessarily mean being good at another. Especially since much of the strategy in Vanguard is unique to Vanguard as a card game. | |
|
| |
3XXXDDD Admin
| Subject: Re: WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread 2012-10-27, 07:35 | |
| | |
|
| |
Alice Admin
| Subject: Re: WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread 2012-10-27, 09:22 | |
| | |
|
| |
Dark5ide
| Subject: Re: WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread 2012-10-27, 13:03 | |
| - Alice wrote:
- Sigh, bor~ing
Well the top 3 are, but I'm glad to see that a souless OTT placed, as well as a Granblue! AND Narakumi taking the rest! Not perfect, but it's better than most other TCG scenes. | |
|
| |
3XXXDDD Admin
| Subject: Re: WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread 2012-11-03, 23:22 | |
| LA T8 5 GP 1 OTT (I imagine Souless) 1 Kagero 1 Granblue (fucking win dammit)
LA T4 Kagero Granblue (fucking win dammit) 2 GP
LA Finals Granblue & Gold Paladin | |
|
| |
Alice Admin
| Subject: Re: WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread 2012-11-03, 23:30 | |
| GRANBLUE WON AHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAAHHAHAHAHA | |
|
| |
Dark5ide
| Subject: Re: WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread 2012-11-03, 23:31 | |
| | |
|
| |
Alice Admin
| Subject: Re: WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread 2012-11-03, 23:35 | |
| We can confirm so far it's Cocytus + DSM | |
|
| |
3XXXDDD Admin
| Subject: Re: WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread 2012-11-03, 23:37 | |
| It'll be up on the site soon enough anyway. Other news, apparently everything else was GP and or Soulless. | |
|
| |
Alice Admin
| Subject: Re: WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread 2012-11-03, 23:46 | |
| So Granblue can't go to nationals and 3rd place Lawkeeper is going instead because Bushiroad are fucking wankers and make up arbitrary bullshit. They have some completely asshat pulled excuse for not paying their travel expenses like "it's too close to the date of nationals". Whatever the FUCK that means. Since it has absolutely nothing to do with jack of dick anything.
That completely sours the Granblue victory. | |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread | |
| |
|
| |
| WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread | |
|