HomeHome  V*Mundi Blog  FAQFAQ  SearchSearch  RegisterRegister  Log inLog in  

Share | 
 

 WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread

View previous topic View next topic Go down 
Go to page : Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 9, 10, 11, 12  Next
AuthorMessage
Pcyborg

avatar


PostSubject: Re: WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread   2012-11-12, 12:01

I was present for the asian oceania finals. Truth be told, I'm very disappointed with the Narukami player.

OTT was the usual Moon build. Straight forward. But the Narukami was there as if he was playing to lose. A few cards/plays which I noticed

G3
Djinn
DKV (saw at least 2 copies of it)
BreakThrough
ThunderBreak
DreadCharge
For one of the matches, he rode Djinn and called DKV on the RG.

G2
S- Intercept
10K Vanilla
DeathScythe

G1
Djinn
8k Vanilla
Unicorn Clone (6k base +2k on call)
Guld
10K booster

Triggers
All 4 were seen (Stand/Draw/Heal/Crit) but doesnt seem to be standard triggers.

FVG
G3 searcher

Tons of misplays. He seems to be playing to lose. There was absolutely NO consistency with the deck. Some of the matches were not monitored closely. The guy kept repeatingly use DKV skill upon attack declaration instead of during main phase. He didnt get caught the first time, but the judge spotted him when he attempted again and he was told that he cant use it. To make it worse, he was the Singapore representative. We have a freaking strong player base. Makes me wonder how the hell did this guy actually got through the WGP qualifiers in the first place...

The matches between the top two were really entertaining. Both players misgraded several times or didnt get to smoothly ride but somehow manage to get through. I'm sure they werent serious but could tell that they possess some degree of skill.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Lich_Lord_Fortissimo

avatar


PostSubject: Re: WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread   2012-11-12, 13:32

I am an ex Narukami player and what is this

Jesus, it sounds like he had no grasp of the finer points of Vanguard. At all.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Alice
Admin
avatar


PostSubject: Re: WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread   2012-11-12, 23:09

You want to know how an awful deck and an awful player gets through ~200 people in a national qualifier? Two words:

Double Elimination
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Dark5ide

avatar


PostSubject: Re: WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread   2012-11-12, 23:49

Alice wrote:
You want to know how an awful deck and an awful player gets through ~200 people in a national qualifier? Two words:

Double Elimination

Is there any reason as to why, other than to try and cheap out on man-power/hours? It's a lot easier to manage 200+ people when the pool gets smaller after every round...
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Alice
Admin
avatar


PostSubject: Re: WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread   2012-11-13, 02:21

Not sure what you mean. If you're asking why use double elimination, I honestly think it's because they don't know any better. I doubt anyone at Bushiroad sat down with a table matrix to do math on optimal tournament format solutions.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
3XXXDDD
Admin
avatar


PostSubject: Re: WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread   2012-11-13, 13:25

Back to top Go down
View user profile
Lich_Lord_Fortissimo

avatar


PostSubject: Re: WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread   2012-11-13, 13:44

Woodard Y U NO understand the necessities of research?

I am rather interested in how he'll progress from here. I know that his Spectral Duke deck was running 1 or 2 cards that aren't needed such as Beaumains. Will he overhaul it or tweak his existing deck?

I am waiting on the news of him winning with Tachikaze. Will someone please win with Tachikaze?
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Alice
Admin
avatar


PostSubject: Re: WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread   2012-11-13, 13:49

Well his nats finals game was basically all sack so I'm not sure if he'll be motivated to fix it up. If he doesn't let impact bias affect him, maybe he will.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
3XXXDDD
Admin
avatar


PostSubject: Re: WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread   2012-11-13, 14:11

Alice wrote:
Well his nats finals game was basically all sack so I'm not sure if he'll be motivated to fix it up. If he doesn't let impact bias affect him, maybe he will.

Well the last was sack anyway. We don't about the 2 games before that.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
zawarudo

avatar


PostSubject: Re: WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread   2012-11-19, 18:51

Pretty much just here to post that single rounds is the worst idea of all time.

Getting stuck at Grade 0 in the first round was $200 well spent!
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Alice
Admin
avatar


PostSubject: Re: WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread   2012-11-19, 19:04

hahahahah
Back to top Go down
View user profile
zawarudo

avatar


PostSubject: Re: WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread   2012-11-19, 19:12

Friend got stuck on Wingal Brave while against an MLB deck.

GOOD TIMES.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Alice
Admin
avatar


PostSubject: Re: WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread   2012-11-19, 19:22

Jesus Odinson Christ.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
AstoXx

avatar


PostSubject: Re: WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread   2012-11-19, 19:24

So, I want to make a deck that pretty much no-one is using and go and wreck everyone shit with it at some tourneys... what clan should I use then? Maybe I can do my part to help break up the GP buttrimming that seems to be a epidemic right now.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
zawarudo

avatar


PostSubject: Re: WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread   2012-11-19, 19:26

Pendragon RP.

Asura can also wreck people's face all the way till Feb.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Alice
Admin
avatar


PostSubject: Re: WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread   2012-11-19, 19:29

Megacolony Giraffa. I'm not even joking you in the slightest.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Klaus

avatar


PostSubject: Re: WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread   2012-11-19, 19:30

That's what I'm doing come Set 4 meself. Though focusing on DP crap initially.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
zawarudo

avatar


PostSubject: Re: WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread   2012-11-19, 20:12

Hey wait wait.

Is it me or did Mr Filipiono double heal win Oceanic finals?

LOL????
Back to top Go down
View user profile
3XXXDDD
Admin
avatar


PostSubject: Re: WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread   2012-11-21, 08:50

Apparently this is still going on



1 Gold Paladin
2 Oracle Think Tank
3 Narukami
4 Narukami

Also, these are the qualified participants ~
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Kaji Motomiya

avatar


PostSubject: Re: WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread   2012-11-22, 01:20

Wooh, Philippines!
Back to top Go down
View user profile
3XXXDDD
Admin
avatar


PostSubject: Re: WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread   2012-12-03, 18:35

Back to top Go down
View user profile
WingZero

avatar


PostSubject: Re: WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread   2012-12-03, 18:50

Oh Brandon Smith... he put me in losers at the Canadian Regional to go to the WCQ.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Alice
Admin
avatar


PostSubject: Re: WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread   2012-12-03, 18:57

He put you in losers? What does that statement mean?
Back to top Go down
View user profile
WingZero

avatar


PostSubject: Re: WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread   2012-12-03, 19:04

He knocked me out of the tournament :P
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Alice
Admin
avatar


PostSubject: Re: WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread   2012-12-03, 19:08

Legitimately? The way you worded it sounded like it was pre-arranged.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Sponsored content




PostSubject: Re: WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread   

Back to top Go down
 
WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread
View previous topic View next topic Back to top 
Page 10 of 12Go to page : Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 9, 10, 11, 12  Next

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Moved: http://v-mundi.com - VMundi :: Cardfight!! Vanguard :: News-
Jump to: