Moved: http://v-mundi.com - VMundi
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.



 
HomeHome  V*Mundi Blog  Latest imagesLatest images  SearchSearch  RegisterRegister  Log inLog in  

 

 WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread

Go down 
+25
Traesive
CyprusWHM
WingZero
Kaji Motomiya
AstoXx
zawarudo
Pcyborg
Lich_Lord_Fortissimo
corundum
meeb
veldrien
Dark5ide
Kotters
HugeMcLargeTall
PuppyCop
FBZyphere0101
Epideme
smellmybox
MechaCrash
Klaus
SoulKaiser
HerO
Wolfen
Alice
3XXXDDD
29 posters
Go to page : Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 6, 7, 8 ... 10, 11, 12  Next
AuthorMessage
SoulKaiser

SoulKaiser



WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread - Page 7 Empty
PostSubject: Re: WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread   WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread - Page 7 Empty2012-10-08, 09:53

Based Graph. And it's a least somewhat varied!

Also be sure to load up on carbs and lean protein, avoid fats and sugars because they cause drowsiness .Bring nuts, granola etc. to stack up on in between games, and if you're running on E after 9 hours of play, just go for broke and bring a 5 hour for an emergency final technique.
Back to top Go down
3XXXDDD
Admin
3XXXDDD



WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread - Page 7 Empty
PostSubject: Re: WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread   WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread - Page 7 Empty2012-10-08, 10:09

Trail Mix. Got it!
Back to top Go down
3XXXDDD
Admin
3XXXDDD



WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread - Page 7 Empty
PostSubject: Re: WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread   WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread - Page 7 Empty2012-10-09, 12:22

France updated with delicious pie chart and a straight top 8 list.
Back to top Go down
3XXXDDD
Admin
3XXXDDD



WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread - Page 7 Empty
PostSubject: Re: WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread   WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread - Page 7 Empty2012-10-13, 07:38

WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread - Page 7 525077_377126192363207_1513124412_n

NJ/NY stats if anyone cares~
Back to top Go down
Wolfen
Moderator
Wolfen



WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread - Page 7 Empty
PostSubject: Re: WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread   WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread - Page 7 Empty2012-10-13, 14:26

3XXXDDD wrote:
WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread - Page 7 525077_377126192363207_1513124412_n

NJ/NY stats if anyone cares~

With as many DQ's there were in the top 8... it's kind of a moot point, though yet another GP top showing just continues to show us all what we've known for too long now.
Back to top Go down
3XXXDDD
Admin
3XXXDDD



WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread - Page 7 Empty
PostSubject: Re: WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread   WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread - Page 7 Empty2012-10-14, 08:55

Atlana updated.

Judges were good, one single DQ during the entire tournament (deliberate cheating it seems).

ANGEL FEATHERS CAME FOURTH!!!
Back to top Go down
3XXXDDD
Admin
3XXXDDD



WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread - Page 7 Empty
PostSubject: Re: WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread   WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread - Page 7 Empty2012-10-16, 06:51

Angel Feathers that placed 4th in Atlanta.

4 Chief Nurse, Shamsiel
3 The Phoenix, Calamity Flame

4 Million Ray Pegasus
3 Core Memory Armaros
2 Love Machine Gun
2 Holy Zone, Penemue

4 Battle Cupid Nociel
4 Burst Shot Bethnael
4 Thousand Ray Pegasus
3 Pure Keeper Requiel

1 Hope Child Turiel
4 Bouquet's Toss Manager
4 Sunny Smile Angel
4 Rocket Dash Unicorn
4 Critical Hit Angel
Back to top Go down
Alice
Admin
Alice



WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread - Page 7 Empty
PostSubject: Re: WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread   WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread - Page 7 Empty2012-10-16, 07:13

If he ran 4 perfect guards, 1 more Calamity, and less Cupid Nociel, he'd probably have done a bit better. Interesting Special Intercept tech, though I don't think it needs the extra guard more than extra swapping/offense/card advantage.
Back to top Go down
3XXXDDD
Admin
3XXXDDD



WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread - Page 7 Empty
PostSubject: Re: WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread   WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread - Page 7 Empty2012-10-16, 07:25

Alice wrote:
If he ran 4 perfect guards, 1 more Calamity, and less Cupid Nociel, he'd probably have done a bit better. Interesting Special Intercept tech, though I don't think it needs the extra guard more than extra swapping/offense/card advantage.

I wouldn't be as sure if only because of the way he lost was sack-tastic and brutal.

Vs Nova Grapplers
AF attacks for final Damage
NG lands a Sixth Damage Heal

Next turn
NG Attack with both rear columns
NG Attacks with Asura Kaiser checking two Grade 3s standing two Death Army G1 and the Rears they were boosting.

I'm currently using Mastema in that extra Grade 2 spot because it's a handy extra 20000 column late game or at worst 11000 attacker. I've tried Penemue, people got very distracted by it but other than that, meh.

3 Phoenix, 3 Armaros thing is odd though. I'm adamant on maxing both.
Back to top Go down
SoulKaiser

SoulKaiser



WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread - Page 7 Empty
PostSubject: Re: WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread   WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread - Page 7 Empty2012-10-16, 08:13

3XXXDDD wrote:
Angel Feathers that placed 4th in Atlanta.

4 Chief Nurse, Shamsiel
3 The Phoenix, Calamity Flame

4 Million Ray Pegasus
3 Core Memory Armaros
2 Love Machine Gun
2 Holy Zone, Penemue

4 Battle Cupid Nociel
4 Burst Shot Bethnael
4 Thousand Ray Pegasus
3 Pure Keeper Requiel

1 Hope Child Turiel
4 Bouquet's Toss Manager
4 Sunny Smile Angel
4 Rocket Dash Unicorn
4 Critical Hit Angel

Oh wow, that deck is only marginally retarded. PROGRESS!!! If he maxed out Pure and Calamity and cut out some of his clutter he might actually have been a GOOD deckbuilder.


And looking at the Championship decks, I can see they're gettong saner. Good news for the Vmundi Army guys!
Back to top Go down
Alice
Admin
Alice



WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread - Page 7 Empty
PostSubject: Re: WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread   WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread - Page 7 Empty2012-10-16, 13:55

I hope it's not a fluke and people are actually getting saner. I'm tired of people being bad at Vanguard. Vocally so. With fallacies and active retardation.
Back to top Go down
SoulKaiser

SoulKaiser



WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread - Page 7 Empty
PostSubject: Re: WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread   WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread - Page 7 Empty2012-10-16, 14:59

You're doing the best you can Alice. I'm just worried about what'll happen once the Bushivetr hits.
Back to top Go down
3XXXDDD
Admin
3XXXDDD



WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread - Page 7 Empty
PostSubject: Re: WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread   WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread - Page 7 Empty2012-10-16, 15:10

SoulKaiser wrote:
You're doing the best you can Alice. I'm just worried about what'll happen once the Bushivetr hits.

Bushivetr? Bushi Veterans?

Also I'm confident it would have won the Tournament if it weren't for that sack-tastic Nova Grappler.
Back to top Go down
3XXXDDD
Admin
3XXXDDD



WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread - Page 7 Empty
PostSubject: Re: WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread   WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread - Page 7 Empty2012-10-17, 07:53

Updated with Osaka Results. Woot! More Angel Feathers!
Back to top Go down
3XXXDDD
Admin
3XXXDDD



WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread - Page 7 Empty
PostSubject: Re: WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread   WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread - Page 7 Empty2012-10-18, 07:46

Atlanta stats up
Back to top Go down
SoulKaiser

SoulKaiser



WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread - Page 7 Empty
PostSubject: Re: WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread   WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread - Page 7 Empty2012-10-18, 08:51

Well it seems we got some Vmundi fans in the ATL! :D If you're going to use overhyped clan, at least use it right!
Back to top Go down
Dark5ide

Dark5ide



WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread - Page 7 Empty
PostSubject: Re: WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread   WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread - Page 7 Empty2012-10-18, 16:51

Know what I think is weird? No kagero have placed stateside. I figured they would be doing better.
Back to top Go down
Alice
Admin
Alice



WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread - Page 7 Empty
PostSubject: Re: WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread   WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread - Page 7 Empty2012-10-18, 23:17

Eien's face when Kagero isn't top tier hueheuehhue
Back to top Go down
3XXXDDD
Admin
3XXXDDD



WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread - Page 7 Empty
PostSubject: Re: WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread   WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread - Page 7 Empty2012-10-20, 14:10

Coming straight from the source

1st Ezel/Garmore
2nd Luquier Tamer
3rd/4th Duke/Spike

292 participants (apparently the biggest European Qualifier, probably because of the Euro's afterwards being an attractive thing to be at).
Back to top Go down
Alice
Admin
Alice



WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread - Page 7 Empty
PostSubject: Re: WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread   WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread - Page 7 Empty2012-10-20, 15:51

Or because it's really easy to get short public trans to an event and there are a lot of people in a relatively smaller area.
Back to top Go down
3XXXDDD
Admin
3XXXDDD



WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread - Page 7 Empty
PostSubject: Re: WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread   WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread - Page 7 Empty2012-10-20, 17:26

Alice wrote:
Or because it's really easy to get short public trans to an event and there are a lot of people in a relatively smaller area.

Well there was a lot of Foreign people there. So I'm assuming some were here for the Euro's being on afterwards.

Anyway, go Pale Moon!
Back to top Go down
veldrien

veldrien



WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread - Page 7 Empty
PostSubject: Re: WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread   WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread - Page 7 Empty2012-10-21, 03:35

I just want to say I am very disappointed with you Alice. I never really ventured onto the forum and stuck to the articles (didn't really read many but some people linked me to a couple.). But now that I have ventured here, I just have to say that you should be ashamed, your bashing of the players who topped/won the Qualifiers (including myself) and players in general just proves that you should just stop. Your not as good as you think you are, and if you want to prove otherwise instead of bashing people on your forum why don't you actually go to the qualifiers and accomplish something.

Your assessment of many cards is incorrect (Spectral Duke and Crossrides being some of them), and your just overly opinionated and think your the fucking best. Prove yourself, and then maybe you can talk shit. I may agree with you on somethings, and I appreciate your mathematical breakdowns on odds/ridechains/etc, as it helps a lot of players and that is what a blog for a game should do, but just because you understand all of that does not make you the best player ever, the're are many other players that have the base concepts down just as good as you do.


Last edited by veldrien on 2012-10-21, 03:36; edited 1 time in total (Reason for editing : added a few lines.)
Back to top Go down
Dark5ide

Dark5ide



WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread - Page 7 Empty
PostSubject: Re: WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread   WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread - Page 7 Empty2012-10-21, 03:40

veldrien wrote:
I just want to say I am very disappointed with you Alice. I never really ventured onto the forum and stuck to the articles (didn't really read many but some people linked me to a couple.). But now that I have ventured here, I just have to say that you should be ashamed, your bashing of the players who topped/won the Qualifiers (including myself) and players in general just proves that you should just stop. Your not as good as you think you are, and if you want to prove otherwise instead of bashing people on your forum why don't you actually go to the qualifiers and accomplish something.

Your assessment of many cards is incorrect (Spectral Duke and Crossrides being some of them), and your just overly opinionated and think your the fucking best. Prove yourself, and then maybe you can talk shit. I may agree with you on somethings, and I appreciate your mathematical breakdowns on odds/ridechains/etc, as it helps a lot of players and that is what a blog for a game should do, but just because you understand all of that does not make you the best player ever, the're are many other players that have the base concepts down just as good as you do.

WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread - Page 7 YCzMI
Back to top Go down
Alice
Admin
Alice



WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread - Page 7 Empty
PostSubject: Re: WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread   WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread - Page 7 Empty2012-10-21, 05:57

veldrien wrote:
I just want to say I am very disappointed with you Alice. I never really ventured onto the forum and stuck to the articles (didn't really read many but some people linked me to a couple.). But now that I have ventured here, I just have to say that you should be ashamed, your bashing of the players who topped/won the Qualifiers (including myself) and players in general just proves that you should just stop. Your not as good as you think you are, and if you want to prove otherwise instead of bashing people on your forum why don't you actually go to the qualifiers and accomplish something.

Your assessment of many cards is incorrect (Spectral Duke and Crossrides being some of them), and your just overly opinionated and think your the fucking best. Prove yourself, and then maybe you can talk shit. I may agree with you on somethings, and I appreciate your mathematical breakdowns on odds/ridechains/etc, as it helps a lot of players and that is what a blog for a game should do, but just because you understand all of that does not make you the best player ever, the're are many other players that have the base concepts down just as good as you do.

Winning 5-6 times in one event doesn't make you good either. That's an inductive reasoning fallacy. I don't give a shit about your disappointment. Watch the video. Look at the abominable misplays and general poor conduct of the players. Vanguard is still new enough that yes, it's possible most people at an event are bad or subpar. It's actually funny that you chose me to single out versus everyone else voicing the same opinions.

If you think my assessment of a card is wrong, create a thread and debate me. End of discussion. Claiming superiority like that is no better than the actions you (falsely) projected onto me. If you believe I have to "prove myself", then step back and take a moment to remember Burden of Proof. You made a claim just now and didn't show any evidence. You asserted I was wrong. Show evidence. Last thing I'm going to say through all your wild unsubstantiated claims: Don't make the logical error of assuming a 5-7 round tournament means someone is the best in their region. There are way too many factors that aren't being controlled for and that sample size is so laughably small that if you presented it to a scientist, they wouldn't even bother looking at your work. You can't run an individual as an experiment 5 times and expect a significant result from them. Especially when you haven't controlled for player skill, deck strength, chance, and people who abstained from play or were disqualified.

By the way: Being hostile to someone (without any facts or evidence) is never going to get any point across to them. Except perhaps that they should judge you as a hostile person.
Back to top Go down
veldrien

veldrien



WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread - Page 7 Empty
PostSubject: Re: WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread   WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread - Page 7 Empty2012-10-21, 06:09

So I should just silently watch from the shadows as you constantly make false statements about the people who have actually done well? Again you more or less said that your better then us and its not very hard to do what we have done yet you have yet to do it.
Back to top Go down
Sponsored content





WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread - Page 7 Empty
PostSubject: Re: WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread   WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread - Page 7 Empty

Back to top Go down
 
WCQ 2012 - Results Discussion Thread
Back to top 
Page 7 of 12Go to page : Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 6, 7, 8 ... 10, 11, 12  Next
 Similar topics
-
» WCQ 2012 Official Format and Rules Thread
» Thread derailment
» Suggestions thread
» Hal's Trade Thread
» I told you to make a new thread

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Moved: http://v-mundi.com - VMundi :: Cardfight!! Vanguard :: News-
Jump to: